Every tender that delivered an actually-working floor had the same eleven line items. Most tenders that delivered failed floors had only three or four — usually combined into a single "supply and install epoxy" line that hid the prep, the broadcast spec, and the joint detail. This page is the practical BOQ template for an industrial-grade resin floor procurement: eleven lines, each with spec language, unit of measure, and the verification check that lets you reject a substandard submission. Substitute system class as needed (PU-cement, epoxy SL, MMA), but the line structure stays the same.
Worked example: 800 m² heavy-duty epoxy quartz broadcast on a logistics warehouse with 3 t reach-truck load. Substitute project numbers and system as needed.
Line 1 of 11 — Substrate Preparation
Mechanical Substrate Preparation
Spec language: Shot-blast preparation to ICRI CSP 3–5 with substrate moisture log per ASTM F2170 in-situ probe at named locations (3 per 1,000 m²) showing ≤75% RH at depth. Loose substrate and laitance to be mechanically removed. Existing coatings to be fully removed unless explicit overlay design from manufacturer.
Verify: Reject without ICRI CSP measurement chart attached + ASTM F2170 moisture log + photos of prepped substrate at named grid locations. See system selection for substrate spec by use case.
Line 2 of 11 — Substrate
Substrate Repair and Levelling
Spec language: Sika MonoTop R3 / R4 (or equivalent equivalent EN 1504-3 class R3 mortar) for substrate repair to ≥25 MPa cohesive strength. Provisional quantity allowance — actual quantity measured on substrate inspection. Crack-isolation membrane (Sika Combiflex or equivalent) over any existing substrate crack > 0.3 mm.
Verify: Submission must price the line as provisional, not fixed — substrate condition can only be confirmed after Line 1 mechanical prep. See substrate moisture remediation.
Line 3 of 11 — Resin Layer 1
Primer Coat
Spec language: Epoxy primer rated for moisture tolerance to 4% CM substrate moisture, applied at 0.3–0.4 kg/m² consumption rate. Sikafloor-156 or equivalent. Applied within 24 hours of Line 1 prep completion to prevent re-contamination.
Verify: SKU and lot number on delivery note + consumption rate calculation per pour batch. Reject if primer SKU substituted without manufacturer authorisation.
Line 4 of 11 — Resin Layer 2
Body Coat (Self-Levelling Epoxy)
Spec language: Self-levelling epoxy body coat at 3.0–4.0 mm thickness. Sikafloor MultiDur-EB-24 or equivalent. Pigment to RAL [specify]. Pot life ≥ 25 minutes at 20°C. Applied at 5.0–6.0 kg/m² consumption.
Verify: Thickness measurement at 5 grid points per 100 m² with depth gauge. SKU + lot + RAL on delivery note + consumption rate per batch.
Line 5 of 11 — Aggregate
Broadcast Quartz Aggregate
Spec language: Kiln-dried quartz aggregate, particle size 0.4–0.8 mm, broadcast at 4.0–5.0 kg/m² to refusal. Colour neutral or pigmented per design intent. Loose aggregate to be vacuum-removed after cure before topcoat application.
Verify: Aggregate particle size + supplier specification at delivery. Consumption rate per batch. Refusal broadcast verified visually + by depth measurement.
Line 6 of 11 — Resin Layer 3
Sealer Coat (Aliphatic Polyurethane)
Spec language: Two-component aliphatic polyurethane sealer at 0.4–0.5 kg/m². UV-stable for outdoor or daylight-exposed environments. Matte or satin finish per design intent. Applied 12+ hours after broadcast vacuum-removal.
Verify: SKU + lot. UV-stability certificate if outdoor exposure. Finish gloss-level on completion (60° gloss meter optional).
Line 7 of 11 — Anti-Slip
Anti-Slip Class Verification
Spec language: DIN 51130 R-class achieved as integral broadcast surface — minimum R11 wet-area, R10 elsewhere. Test report by independent laboratory at 3 named locations after full cure (typically day 7). Result attached to completion certificate.
Verify: Independent test report — not applicator self-certification. See compliance verification §2.
Line 8 of 11 — Joints
Expansion + Saw-Cut Joint Treatment
Spec language: Existing substrate joints replicated through finished floor at exact spacing + width. Joints sealed with two-component polyurethane sealant (Sikaflex PRO 3 or equivalent), backer rod where joint depth > 12 mm. Floor-perimeter joints at walls and column intrusions. Movement-joint width minimum 8 mm.
Verify: Joint plan attached to submission. SKU + lot of sealant. Reject submissions that omit perimeter joints — they're the single most common warranty failure.
Line 9 of 11 — Detail
Perimeter Cove + Column Detail
Spec language: Integral cove base 100 mm height at all walls + column intrusions, formed in same resin chemistry as floor body. Cove radius 30 mm. Required for HACCP / hygiene-grade and recommended for industrial wet-area.
Verify: Cove geometry verified by depth gauge + 30 mm radius template at completion. Required for kitchen / food production tender — non-negotiable.
Line 10 of 11 — QA
Control Samples + Pull-Off Test
Spec language: 3 control samples of full system build-up retained in laboratory archive. 6 EN 1542 / ASTM D7234 pull-off tests at named grid locations after full cure, minimum 1.5 MPa with cohesive substrate failure mode. Independent laboratory result attached to completion certificate.
Verify: Pull-off test report with location grid + failure mode photos. Reject if pull-off < 1.5 MPa or adhesive failure dominant. See warranty types for QA documentation purpose.
Line 11 of 11 — Documentation
Warranty Registration + Completion Documentation
Spec language: Manufacturer product warranty (10 years) registered to project address with SKU + lot + pour date. Applicator installation warranty (5 years) signed by applicator company principal. Substrate prep records + pull-off test results + control samples archive. Completion certificate signed by applicator + owner representative.
Verify: All five documents in project file before final 10% payment release. See floor warranty types for full document checklist.
Summary BOQ table
For an 800 m² heavy-duty quartz broadcast epoxy on logistics warehouse substrate. Totals are typical ranges; final tender will narrow to a specific value per applicator.
| Line | Item | Unit | Qty | Range ₪ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mechanical substrate prep | m² | 800 | 20,000–48,000 |
| 2 | Substrate repair (provisional) | m² | 50 | 4,000–10,000 |
| 3 | Primer coat | m² | 800 | 14,400–28,000 |
| 4 | Body coat self-levelling | m² | 800 | 60,000–112,000 |
| 5 | Broadcast quartz aggregate | m² | 800 | 17,600–32,000 |
| 6 | Sealer coat aliphatic PU | m² | 800 | 28,000–52,000 |
| 7 | Anti-slip class verification | report | 3 | 1,500–3,000 |
| 8 | Joint treatment | lm | 150 | 5,250–12,000 |
| 9 | Perimeter cove detail | lm | 120 | 9,600–21,600 |
| 10 | Control samples + pull-off | set | 1 | 2,500–5,000 |
| 11 | Warranty documentation | set | 1 | included |
| Total estimate range | ₪162,850–323,600 | |||
| Per m² total | ₪204–405 | |||
What to reject in a submission
Five common patterns indicate the submission cannot deliver a working floor and should be returned for revision.
- Single line "supply and install epoxy at ₪X/m²". Hides substrate prep, broadcast quality, joint detail. Reject and request itemisation per the eleven-line structure.
- Substrate prep line missing or below ₪15/m². Implies surface-clean only, not mechanical prep. Sets up year-two delamination.
- Pull-off test line missing. No QA mechanism to verify the install before final payment.
- Generic SKU "epoxy SL" without manufacturer + product. Allows substitution at applicator's discretion. Specify named SKU minimum + equivalent-or-better acceptance criteria.
- Warranty term not specified or shorter than manufacturer's published. Indicates applicator hedge — make explicit by asking for warranty term breakdown.
Substitution for other system classes
- PU-cement 6–9 mm kitchen: Lines 4 + 5 collapse into single PU-cement system pour. Line 3 primer typically integral. Line 6 sealer often integral. Line 9 cove is non-negotiable. Material cost +40–60% vs epoxy quartz.
- MMA fast-cure: Lines 4 + 5 + 6 collapse into MMA system pour. Line 3 primer MMA-specific. Pot life dramatically shorter — pour windows tight. Material cost +30% vs PU-cement.
- Microtopping decorative 2–3 mm: Lines 5 (broadcast) + 8 (joint as substrate-replicated) omitted. Line 6 sealer is critical for stain resistance. Line 9 cove only if hygiene zone. Material cost –60% vs heavy-duty epoxy.
- Polished concrete: Lines 3–6 replaced with densifier application + diamond polishing. Line 7 anti-slip via texture density. Line 8 saw-cut joints integral to slab.
Final read
Eleven lines, named SKU, named test method, named verification check. The BOQ template is the procurement-side enforcement mechanism for the warranty triangle: if a line is omitted, the warranty cannot trigger. Use this as the starting point and substitute system class as needed; the line structure is invariant across resin and cementitious systems. Related: warranty types · compliance verification · how to evaluate an installer · system selection by use case.
Sources
- Sikafloor system tender language (typical applicator submission format).
- Mapei Mapefloor system tender language.
- EN 1542 / ASTM D7234 pull-off testing standards.
- ICRI 310.2R substrate preparation method-to-CSP mapping.
- ASTM F2170 / F1869 substrate moisture testing standards.
- DIN 51130 R-class slip testing methodology.
- IL contractor BOQ samples compiled from 50+ tender submissions.